Home > Bloggery > Not The Best Of Signs

Not The Best Of Signs

December 4th, 2008
Tags:
  1. pharniel
    December 4th, 2008 at 14:48 | #1

    eek

  2. houstoncollector
    December 4th, 2008 at 14:57 | #2

    Oooh. Not a good sign at all.

  3. December 4th, 2008 at 15:23 | #3

    Uhh… No, definitely not at all.

  4. December 4th, 2008 at 15:26 | #4

    I’m betting the company didn’t sanction that page.

  5. TPRJones
    December 4th, 2008 at 15:41 | #5

    How often are they supposed to be paid? I get paid once a month, myself, so that’s not odd at all. And since the December paycheck will be coming early because of the holidays, it’ll be 45 days between checks coming up soon.

  6. December 4th, 2008 at 15:50 | #6

    Eek.

  7. December 4th, 2008 at 16:14 | #7

    somehow I didn’t get it this joke.. Some one explain?

  8. Hanna
    December 4th, 2008 at 16:18 | #8
  9. December 4th, 2008 at 16:57 | #9

    TPRJones: That’s a fair question. I’m usually paid bi-monthly, but that can vary from job to job.

    However, I’m willing to bet that this wouldn’t be an issue if they were normally paid monthly. I’d imagine they’re paid weekly or bi-monthly, which would make sense that this would be an issue after ‘21 days’.

  10. Klaitu
    December 4th, 2008 at 17:02 | #10

    Ahh, not Cheyenne Mountain, the place where the government has stashed the stargate..

    Cheyenne Mountain, the game developer making the crappy stargate MMO game.

    I guess when you agree to pay people money, you should pay them.

  11. TPRJones
    December 4th, 2008 at 17:10 | #11

    omg not Stargate Worlds?!

    I was looking forward to that one. :(

  12. December 4th, 2008 at 17:33 | #12

    21 days is not a big deal. In my experience the higher the pay frequency, the lower the wage. When I was a waiter back in college days I was paid daily. GM CEO got paid $1 a month but he depend on his huge fat check at the end of the bail out.

  13. J Thomas
    December 4th, 2008 at 18:10 | #13

    It’s a big deal when a company promises to pay its employees on a regular frequency, and misses those paydays. It’s a much bigger deal if the reason for the delay isn’t logistical (the printer broke, the checks were lost in the mail, etc.). Ask Bill Roper what happens when a company doesn’t have enough cash to pay its employees.

  14. Zuzax
    December 4th, 2008 at 18:13 | #14
  15. December 4th, 2008 at 18:47 | #15

    I had a company not pay me once…

    We went out and got drunk and decided he’d never pay us. We took stuff from the company and sold it on eBay until we were all paid in full.

    The friend who owned the company secretly confided years later he preferred us getting the stuff rather than the creditors.

  16. Gawain
    December 4th, 2008 at 19:04 | #16

    I had to go look up who these people were. I guess that says something about how hard stargate worlds is being pushed.

    In the same (but not same) vein:
    http://www.iscaliforniaonfire.com

  17. Freakazoid
    December 4th, 2008 at 19:16 | #17

    Yeah, I had to ponder that for a bit too. Glad it was talking about the stargate devs and not NORAD. Still bad news though.

  18. Jessica Mulligan
    December 5th, 2008 at 03:27 | #18

    The amazing thing is that these guys have gone through at least $31 million. From a year ago at the Austin GDC: http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=15415:

    Joe Ybarra: “… Completely different from that is my current company, which is funded entirely by angel investors. The biggest one is, I think, $1 million, and we have over 100 investors.”

    Joe Ybarra: “We have an LLC structure, in which we sell a percentage of a company, but it’s not a traditional equity-based structure. To date, we’ve raised about $31 million dollars, and are raising more for studios 2 and 3.”

    And then there is this:

    http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/395/RipOff0395659.htm

    As usual, it is the people in the trenches that are paying the price. And why does this crap always seem to happen at Christmas time?

  19. Noel
    December 5th, 2008 at 04:07 | #19

    Gotta say, it’s not a huge surprise if they fail. The business plan of starting 7 studios before you have a single product is… well, not without its flaws.

  20. Dan Gray
    December 5th, 2008 at 05:31 | #20

    Sucky.

  21. Balasarius
    December 5th, 2008 at 10:26 | #21

    Totally thought this was about NORAD.

  22. December 5th, 2008 at 11:55 | #22

    For what it’s worth there is a rebuttal of sorts over on TenTonHammer.

    Apparently it’s a temporary solvency blip. The marketing guy from CME doesn’t deny outright that people aren’t getting paid so it appears that the basic premise is probably true.

  23. December 5th, 2008 at 12:11 | #23

    I just hope they haven’t leaked enough employees to seriously impeed development. Fingers crossed they get SGW out the door in good shape.

  24. Grinless
    December 5th, 2008 at 12:35 | #24

    Not gonna happen Dan.

    If they are out of money now, they are not going to deliver a product in any kind of good shape.

  25. Vaxhacker
    December 5th, 2008 at 12:46 | #25

    I was part of a startup that went through a “temporary solvency blip”. 4 months later, people were still not being paid (but still working – we were young and idealistic/stupid). As Grinless pointed out, running out of money before finishing only means bad things, especially for an MMO where the launch costs are significant.

  26. December 5th, 2008 at 12:48 | #26

    Gamasutra also has a response from CME on the issue as well.

    http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=21363

  27. December 5th, 2008 at 15:46 | #27

    “Not gonna happen Dan.

    If they are out of money now, they are not going to deliver a product in any kind of good shape.”

    I’m not sure there’s enough miracles for this not to be an accurate assessment. NDA aside, the game isn’t good. I wish it was, I really do. That IP is ripe for an open-ended (yet familiar) landscape to putz around in to your hearts content fighting wave after wave of hilarious bad (good) guys. :sigh:

  28. Joe
    December 6th, 2008 at 00:58 | #28

    Uh… by “NDA aside”, you mean “There’s a beta and I’m in it and I’m breaking the NDA”? Just checkin’.

Comments are closed.

Your Ad Here

Broken Toys is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!