As seen by a LaRouche stalker blog commenter, the LaRouche Youth are enjoying their moment of cathode-ray sun.
The reactions to the evidently competent, recently published LPAC exclusive “Halo 3: The ‘Third Wave’ of Destroying the U.S.”, as received by its authors in the form of “Letters to the Editor” by swarms of agitated Internet-addicts, reinforce the simple points outlined, but not understood by its relevant audience, due to certain, cumulative effects of turning over the sovereign function of creativity to a Tweener-oriented culture of “groupthink”, as typified by Ayn Rand’s Wikipedia.org.
The sacrificing of one’s will to a higher commitment toward the Common Good would be appreciated by future generations. But to sacrifice one’s will to the third-wave of the counter-culture fostered by DARPA, Microsoft, BAE Systems, and the new religious revival known as the Fools of Silicon Valley, is to submit to America’s long-standing enemy—the British Empire!
Sadly, despite the title, nowhere does the screed mention either Halo 3 or Abu Ghraib, but instead reads like a randomly edited Prokofy Neva rant on Wikipedia. The Queen was reportedly not amused.
#1 by yunk on October 1st, 2007
The sacrificing of one’s will to a higher commitment toward the Common Good would be appreciated by future generations
That damn “free” will, always getting in the way of Progress and Revolution!
#2 by Sweetmeat on October 1st, 2007
Wow my eyes glazed over halfway through the second pararaph. Here I thought the British were our friends since WWII.
#3 by ghiest on October 1st, 2007
I consider the Americans more friends than 90% of the Europeans, we have had less friction over the life of your nation (apart from the whole Independance thing
) than most of the other Nations.
Anyhow who is this guy and why does he proffess to have the lowdown on what gaming is doing to our Youth? An economist, that gives him the authority to speak on phsychiatry and polotics?
I just think he’s kinda a cross between Jack Thompson and a devout christian (is it what you call a christia conservative?).
Got to laugh really.
#4 by Dren on October 1st, 2007
They must know what they are talking about. They use extremely long run-on sentences that leave me confused and befuddled. Bow to their excellence.
#5 by =j on October 1st, 2007
Whoa! Ayn Rand runs wikipedia?
…and I think the second quoted paragraph reads better if it ends “ALL FOR ONE OR NONE!”
#6 by Soulflame on October 1st, 2007
I’d love to see randriods and larouchians fight it out. The DVDs could be sold to insomniacs the world around.
#7 by J. on October 1st, 2007
I have to admit that I had never heard nor cared about Lyndon LaRouche before reading about him on this site a year ago. Still waiting to hear why I should care. Sounds as though Jack Thompson has more clout, and that ain’t much.
#8 by hkedi on October 1st, 2007
I remember when I was at the University of Houston, which had a fairly active Lyndon Larouche group (4-5 people who would regularly set up a table at the math building). Kinda interesting in a libertarian way untill she said how England was trying to still overthrow the US since they will still pissed over the revolution. I laughed and walked off, they are truly from an alternate view of reality, kinda like a lot of southern baptists.
#9 by Sl0th on October 2nd, 2007
Gotta watch out for those sneaky British. They’ve already gone to war with the U.S. twice… The third time could be just around the corner. When we least expect it…
#10 by hkedi on October 2nd, 2007
MUhahaha…. Well the second time was really our fault in a massively stupid way, all we really got out of the war of 1812 was getting the White House burnt and Andrew Jackson.