<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Papers, Please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/</link>
	<description>Random Comments About Games and Tractors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:31:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prodigal</title>
		<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7884</link>
		<dc:creator>Prodigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjennings.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/#comment-7884</guid>
		<description>I agree, ageplay isn&#039;t pedophilia. And yet promoting it does draw the pedos. While I&#039;m turned off by it, I have respected friends, consenting adults and even real life couples who love to engage in it. And while I&#039;m turned off by it and it&#039;s been against policy in my sim since long before LL took a public stance, I tolerate it, and I don&#039;t feel any need to smoke it out wherever it lies.

Also, while it&#039;s harmless sexual play when it&#039;s between consenting adults, actually putting up a banner to advertise it will draw the creeps, who will populate and cross the line until pedo porn becomes the main feature. I&#039;ve seen it lower the tone of a few clubs that were formally for healthy adults.

Btw, Dave, if you&#039;ve only scratched the surface of Gorean lifestyle and come away with a snap impression of it, then you&#039;re no different than those &#039;Goreans&#039; who believe themself to be engaging in it. It&#039;s certainly not for everyone, not even for most the people who think it is for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, ageplay isn&#8217;t pedophilia. And yet promoting it does draw the pedos. While I&#8217;m turned off by it, I have respected friends, consenting adults and even real life couples who love to engage in it. And while I&#8217;m turned off by it and it&#8217;s been against policy in my sim since long before LL took a public stance, I tolerate it, and I don&#8217;t feel any need to smoke it out wherever it lies.</p>
<p>Also, while it&#8217;s harmless sexual play when it&#8217;s between consenting adults, actually putting up a banner to advertise it will draw the creeps, who will populate and cross the line until pedo porn becomes the main feature. I&#8217;ve seen it lower the tone of a few clubs that were formally for healthy adults.</p>
<p>Btw, Dave, if you&#8217;ve only scratched the surface of Gorean lifestyle and come away with a snap impression of it, then you&#8217;re no different than those &#8216;Goreans&#8217; who believe themself to be engaging in it. It&#8217;s certainly not for everyone, not even for most the people who think it is for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mist</title>
		<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjennings.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/#comment-7881</guid>
		<description>I fully respect LL for removing ageplay from their game, but I&#039;m not really sure how ageplay got equated with child pornography.  Ageplay is two consenting adults engaging in virtual dressup by altering their character&#039;s height parameters.  Child pornography is the vile practice of exploiting real children for sadistic gratification and/or profit.  To say that ageplay equals child pornography is greatly downplaying how horrific child pornography truely is.  Ageplay is not horrific, its just weird but ultimately not N-factor times weirder than any other form of D/s sexual roleplay.  Ageplay has been going on between consenting adults since chat software was invented, and going on in people&#039;s bedrooms for far longer than that.  I mean a schoolgirl uniform on a rack is probably the first thing you&#039;ll see when you walk into one of your finer upscale sex shops.  This stuff is going to crop up in EVERY virtual space where you give players that much control over their character.  Isn&#039;t a girl in a schoolgirl uniform the display ad for that &#039;3D adult chat software&#039; on a lot of online gaming sites banner rotation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully respect LL for removing ageplay from their game, but I&#8217;m not really sure how ageplay got equated with child pornography.  Ageplay is two consenting adults engaging in virtual dressup by altering their character&#8217;s height parameters.  Child pornography is the vile practice of exploiting real children for sadistic gratification and/or profit.  To say that ageplay equals child pornography is greatly downplaying how horrific child pornography truely is.  Ageplay is not horrific, its just weird but ultimately not N-factor times weirder than any other form of D/s sexual roleplay.  Ageplay has been going on between consenting adults since chat software was invented, and going on in people&#8217;s bedrooms for far longer than that.  I mean a schoolgirl uniform on a rack is probably the first thing you&#8217;ll see when you walk into one of your finer upscale sex shops.  This stuff is going to crop up in EVERY virtual space where you give players that much control over their character.  Isn&#8217;t a girl in a schoolgirl uniform the display ad for that &#8216;3D adult chat software&#8217; on a lot of online gaming sites banner rotation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMODump.com &#187; Big Brother Keeping An Eye On Second Life</title>
		<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7859</link>
		<dc:creator>MMODump.com &#187; Big Brother Keeping An Eye On Second Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjennings.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/#comment-7859</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott writes that he can see where the train tracks cross. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott writes that he can see where the train tracks cross. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CmdrSlack.com &#187; Linden Lab To Roll Out An ID-Verification System</title>
		<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7883</link>
		<dc:creator>CmdrSlack.com &#187; Linden Lab To Roll Out An ID-Verification System</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 19:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjennings.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/#comment-7883</guid>
		<description>[...] check mark in the &#8220;All The News That&#8217;s Late To Print&#8221; column. Lum has some great comments about it over at Broken Toys. He brings up some pretty interesting points, and a few of them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] check mark in the &#8220;All The News That&#8217;s Late To Print&#8221; column. Lum has some great comments about it over at Broken Toys. He brings up some pretty interesting points, and a few of them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rickey</title>
		<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7858</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjennings.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/#comment-7858</guid>
		<description>Okay, a few things:

1) The &quot;ZOMG PORN!&quot; reaction didn&#039;t start from me until very recently, when I actually went into SL.  And frankly, although I could have done without finding out about Goreans (for some reason they *really* creep me out), I don&#039;t care that much.  It just annoys the shit out of me when SL residents act like ageplay doesn&#039;t even exist anymore, and sexplay is some fringe activity that *isn&#039;t* all over the place in SL.

2) Before a few months ago when I found out about the ageplay, I didn&#039;t concern myself about what was *in* SL at all.  I stuck to discussions of their business model and the theory of a virtual MUSH.  At one point, we even considered using SL as a platform to build our games.

3) Yes, every virtual world has its seedy side, but in the games it&#039;s much more hidden (from everyone but, say, a GM character with /snoop capability).  So that isn&#039;t the big deal.  In SL, it&#039;s not at all hidden.

4) I do know some of the Lindens, certainly far more of them than Blizzard employees.  And I&#039;m not particularly happy that they set off this particular PR shitstorm, and we probably will talk about it at a conference someday soon.

5) If you want to talk about age verification, you&#039;ve got to talk about the porn and the sexplay, because without them nobody would care about verifying anyone&#039;s age.  I&#039;ll go a step further, if it wasn&#039;t for the ageplay and the kiddie porn, it wouldn&#039;t be happening.  LL is trying to get themselves out from under some serious legal consequences.

6) SL is not the web.  Everything in SL is on LL servers, using LL bandwidth, and LL storage, paid for with L$ purchased with real money from LL.  It&#039;s a commercial venture operated for profit, where everything single image and polygon is monetized, not a technological capability available to anyone.

7) We&#039;re about to see a media frenzy over the sex in SL, a backlash triggered by ageplay but primed by LL&#039;s deliberate courting of media attention.  The results will mar the public perception of virtual worlds for *years*, and quite probably damage *my* business.  So don&#039;t make me the bad guy.

--Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, a few things:</p>
<p>1) The &#8220;ZOMG PORN!&#8221; reaction didn&#8217;t start from me until very recently, when I actually went into SL.  And frankly, although I could have done without finding out about Goreans (for some reason they *really* creep me out), I don&#8217;t care that much.  It just annoys the shit out of me when SL residents act like ageplay doesn&#8217;t even exist anymore, and sexplay is some fringe activity that *isn&#8217;t* all over the place in SL.</p>
<p>2) Before a few months ago when I found out about the ageplay, I didn&#8217;t concern myself about what was *in* SL at all.  I stuck to discussions of their business model and the theory of a virtual MUSH.  At one point, we even considered using SL as a platform to build our games.</p>
<p>3) Yes, every virtual world has its seedy side, but in the games it&#8217;s much more hidden (from everyone but, say, a GM character with /snoop capability).  So that isn&#8217;t the big deal.  In SL, it&#8217;s not at all hidden.</p>
<p>4) I do know some of the Lindens, certainly far more of them than Blizzard employees.  And I&#8217;m not particularly happy that they set off this particular PR shitstorm, and we probably will talk about it at a conference someday soon.</p>
<p>5) If you want to talk about age verification, you&#8217;ve got to talk about the porn and the sexplay, because without them nobody would care about verifying anyone&#8217;s age.  I&#8217;ll go a step further, if it wasn&#8217;t for the ageplay and the kiddie porn, it wouldn&#8217;t be happening.  LL is trying to get themselves out from under some serious legal consequences.</p>
<p>6) SL is not the web.  Everything in SL is on LL servers, using LL bandwidth, and LL storage, paid for with L$ purchased with real money from LL.  It&#8217;s a commercial venture operated for profit, where everything single image and polygon is monetized, not a technological capability available to anyone.</p>
<p>7) We&#8217;re about to see a media frenzy over the sex in SL, a backlash triggered by ageplay but primed by LL&#8217;s deliberate courting of media attention.  The results will mar the public perception of virtual worlds for *years*, and quite probably damage *my* business.  So don&#8217;t make me the bad guy.</p>
<p>&#8211;Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivianne Draper</title>
		<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7882</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivianne Draper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjennings.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/#comment-7882</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t deny there&#039;s a lot of porn and sex stuff in SL.  And yeah there&#039;s age play and kiddie porn.  Just like every other venue on the internet.  Its not anymore accepted there than it is anywhere else. However for you, and everyone else that doesn&#039;t play it, the first words out of your mouth when talking about SL is &quot;OMG PORN!!!&quot; like somehow the internet isn&#039;t for porn and there&#039;s never been cybering in any other online game EVAR -- which is, of course, complete bullshit.

SWG and The Sims were all about the porn.  Oh but they were real games.  There was oogobs of cybering in DAOC but again, it was a real game.

I&#039;m not denying that ageplay is in there.  What I am saying is that its not prevelant, not accepted and completely not what SL is all about.  And while there is oogobs of sex stuffs in SL -- there&#039;s a huge amount of very cool stuff too.  But while the first words out of yours and everyone else&#039;s mouths is &quot;SL is all about sex&quot; then it just spreads the perception that sex is all it is.

On this thread alone, the first post you make is about how common ageplay is -- when that isn&#039;t the truth at all.  Sexual age play is hidden, in their own little areas, and you have to go looking for it.  Granted before the crack down you didn&#039;t have to look very hard -- just type age play into the search function.  Now its more difficult.

Other than when I called you on it in this thread, I&#039;ll bet you&#039;ve never made a comment about SL that didn&#039;t include something about how it was all about the sex.  Yet you&#039;ve done other stuff in SL.  Why not comment on that?  Is it because then you don&#039;t get to be sensational and righteously bash someone else&#039;s product?  And of course the LL developers aren&#039;t part of the MMOG developers clique and it isn&#039;t like you&#039;ll have to eat your words while sharing a beer with them at some GDC or anything like that.

Age verification (what the original article was about) is a huge issue with serious ramifications for a lot of residents (like Canadian citizens may not be able to verify -- they aren&#039;t on the list of countries the verification product supports).  Yet given an opening, you decide to go for the most sensational most fringe element on the grid -- as if age verification will somehow stop the sexual ageplay practice.  The two are completely unrelated and the former will not have any impact whatsoever on the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t deny there&#8217;s a lot of porn and sex stuff in SL.  And yeah there&#8217;s age play and kiddie porn.  Just like every other venue on the internet.  Its not anymore accepted there than it is anywhere else. However for you, and everyone else that doesn&#8217;t play it, the first words out of your mouth when talking about SL is &#8220;OMG PORN!!!&#8221; like somehow the internet isn&#8217;t for porn and there&#8217;s never been cybering in any other online game EVAR &#8212; which is, of course, complete bullshit.</p>
<p>SWG and The Sims were all about the porn.  Oh but they were real games.  There was oogobs of cybering in DAOC but again, it was a real game.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not denying that ageplay is in there.  What I am saying is that its not prevelant, not accepted and completely not what SL is all about.  And while there is oogobs of sex stuffs in SL &#8212; there&#8217;s a huge amount of very cool stuff too.  But while the first words out of yours and everyone else&#8217;s mouths is &#8220;SL is all about sex&#8221; then it just spreads the perception that sex is all it is.</p>
<p>On this thread alone, the first post you make is about how common ageplay is &#8212; when that isn&#8217;t the truth at all.  Sexual age play is hidden, in their own little areas, and you have to go looking for it.  Granted before the crack down you didn&#8217;t have to look very hard &#8212; just type age play into the search function.  Now its more difficult.</p>
<p>Other than when I called you on it in this thread, I&#8217;ll bet you&#8217;ve never made a comment about SL that didn&#8217;t include something about how it was all about the sex.  Yet you&#8217;ve done other stuff in SL.  Why not comment on that?  Is it because then you don&#8217;t get to be sensational and righteously bash someone else&#8217;s product?  And of course the LL developers aren&#8217;t part of the MMOG developers clique and it isn&#8217;t like you&#8217;ll have to eat your words while sharing a beer with them at some GDC or anything like that.</p>
<p>Age verification (what the original article was about) is a huge issue with serious ramifications for a lot of residents (like Canadian citizens may not be able to verify &#8212; they aren&#8217;t on the list of countries the verification product supports).  Yet given an opening, you decide to go for the most sensational most fringe element on the grid &#8212; as if age verification will somehow stop the sexual ageplay practice.  The two are completely unrelated and the former will not have any impact whatsoever on the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rickey</title>
		<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7880</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 04:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjennings.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/#comment-7880</guid>
		<description>What SL needs most is a search function that doesn&#039;t completely blow.

Vivianne, I can accept that there is some cool stuff in SL.  Can you accept that there is some &lt;a href=&quot;http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=234241&amp;cid=19070941&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;really sick and twisted shit&lt;/a&gt; in there as well?

I&#039;m a pretty liberal guy on sexual issues, even the stuff that personally creeps me out I don&#039;t want prohibited.

Except for this one thing.  They start even *pretending* to fuck around with little kids, and as far as I am concerned they need to be exterminated as a public service.  Yes, the people, not the SL avatars.

So don&#039;t fall into a trap where you feel you have to deny or protect ageplay in SL to save your metaverse.  Because way too many people feel the same way as I do, and they&#039;ll tear the whole thing apart to get at them.

--Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What SL needs most is a search function that doesn&#8217;t completely blow.</p>
<p>Vivianne, I can accept that there is some cool stuff in SL.  Can you accept that there is some <a href="http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=234241&amp;cid=19070941" rel="nofollow">really sick and twisted shit</a> in there as well?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a pretty liberal guy on sexual issues, even the stuff that personally creeps me out I don&#8217;t want prohibited.</p>
<p>Except for this one thing.  They start even *pretending* to fuck around with little kids, and as far as I am concerned they need to be exterminated as a public service.  Yes, the people, not the SL avatars.</p>
<p>So don&#8217;t fall into a trap where you feel you have to deny or protect ageplay in SL to save your metaverse.  Because way too many people feel the same way as I do, and they&#8217;ll tear the whole thing apart to get at them.</p>
<p>&#8211;Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivianne Draper</title>
		<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7879</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivianne Draper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjennings.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/#comment-7879</guid>
		<description>Again, not true Dave.

Midian City, City of Lost Angeles, Lost Gardens of Apollo, Svarga, Underwater Caverns of Rua, Future Perfect, Caledon, Neualtenburg, Nexus Prime, Rennaissance Island...

All just a few of the roleplaying/cool sims I can name that are completely open and free and you don&#039;t have to join a group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, not true Dave.</p>
<p>Midian City, City of Lost Angeles, Lost Gardens of Apollo, Svarga, Underwater Caverns of Rua, Future Perfect, Caledon, Neualtenburg, Nexus Prime, Rennaissance Island&#8230;</p>
<p>All just a few of the roleplaying/cool sims I can name that are completely open and free and you don&#8217;t have to join a group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rickey</title>
		<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7856</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 21:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjennings.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/#comment-7856</guid>
		<description>Now, on the flip side, to be fair, there is some substantial stuff in SL that isn&#039;t at all pornographic, or at least not beyond the PG-13 level. The steampunk spaces are really cool, the Star Trek roleplay areas are neat just to wander around in, and even the gothic vampire stuff is nice to look at (although it tends to cross over with the BDSM a bit).

That&#039;s probably the most interesting thing to look at, the way these things don&#039;t cleanly separate into separate communities, but merge into each other (well, sometimes, the Star Trek stuff is pretty purist).

So there&#039;s cool stuff in there, but most of it is invitation-only (to keep *out* the sex-play, which tends to squat any public space that isn&#039;t policed), you&#039;ve got to join the right clubs.

--Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, on the flip side, to be fair, there is some substantial stuff in SL that isn&#8217;t at all pornographic, or at least not beyond the PG-13 level. The steampunk spaces are really cool, the Star Trek roleplay areas are neat just to wander around in, and even the gothic vampire stuff is nice to look at (although it tends to cross over with the BDSM a bit).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s probably the most interesting thing to look at, the way these things don&#8217;t cleanly separate into separate communities, but merge into each other (well, sometimes, the Star Trek stuff is pretty purist).</p>
<p>So there&#8217;s cool stuff in there, but most of it is invitation-only (to keep *out* the sex-play, which tends to squat any public space that isn&#8217;t policed), you&#8217;ve got to join the right clubs.</p>
<p>&#8211;Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lacero</title>
		<link>http://brokentoys.org/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/comment-page-1/#comment-7857</link>
		<dc:creator>Lacero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 20:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sjennings.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/your-papers-please/#comment-7857</guid>
		<description>oops, too late.  Whether there&#039;s age play or not, if it&#039;s on the BBC (as a report about a german tv program even) it&#039;s true.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6638331.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, too late.  Whether there&#8217;s age play or not, if it&#8217;s on the BBC (as a report about a german tv program even) it&#8217;s true.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6638331.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6638331.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
